• Global Research
    • Understand ESG
    • General Research Insights

Sustainability in 2026: Net zero navigator

  • Article

The race to a global net-zero emission operating system is increasingly determined by economic competitiveness over politics. This creates opportunities in the countries that have already created an enabling environment driving down the cost of cleaner energy and have an economic diversification strategy, such as China and the Middle East. Pragmatism rules, however, as countries acknowledge that adapting to warmer temperatures is part of maintaining productivity.

2026 in one word – pragmatism

We expect the sustainability agenda in 2026 to be characterised by a pragmatism towards a country’s ability to implement climate plans based on economics alone, and a greater acceptance that finance requirements have to come from somewhere other than public coffers.

Being pragmatic about a country’s ability to deliver climate outcomes does not mean that the goal of controlling emissions to limit temperature rises is off the table. It means recognising that letting perfection get in the way of progress has not achieved peak emissions or speed of decline in time to limit temperature rises to below 1.5°C. 2026 will be a reality check on how and where climate plan delivery is moving forward at pace and identifying transition funding.

Pragmatism is not defeatist or sitting on the fence but adaptation is a higher priority in 2026.

A pragmatic approach is also not the same as country or corporate indifference on how an energy transition can be achieved. It means prioritising an approach that makes sense for the country resource availability and competitiveness, and adopting a strategy to deliver based on those foundations. Countries are doing this through nationally determined contributions, and companies are working on transition plans.

The lack of speed on delivering emissions control means that we expect adaptation topics to be back in focus for investors in 2026. Temperature rises are hovering around the 1.4-1.5°C mark, according to the European Commission Copernicus service, so unpredictable weather-related disruption is likely to continue to occur.

While investors can sense-check if companies have robust, diverse supply chains and operating facilities to be resilient on a location basis, inevitably large location-based operational disruption surprises would likely to create valuation swings to corporates exposed in those regions, and create disruption to economic activity.

Adaptation efforts are wide-reaching and can include cooling facilities for people to remain productive when countries are heat stressed, urban heat reduction, water-management systems to manage flooding, and R&D spend on the warming effects on health and food systems. Adaptation finance has been hard to access previously because of the complexity on modelling investment benefits, but work is ongoing in this area and we expect progress through 2026, driven by a renewed country focus on adaptation plans.

These adaptation plans are increasing, including sustainable cooling strategies to adapt to the rising climate risks. Cooling itself faces a climate conundrum, with emissions risks that exacerbate climate change impacts. However, as initiatives such as the Global Cooling Pledge and the alignment of NAPs and NDCs progress, sustainable cooling solutions ease emission risks while providing adaptation benefits.

Transparency on transition finance plays to a pragmatic approach for capital provision.

While transparency on funding for pure-play green activities is well marked out through the green bond market, a transition finance label has been harder for a consensus to agree on. ICMA1, the architect of the Green Bond Principles, published transition guidelines and a handbook in November. This should help investors categorise positive outcomes from a transition strategy in high-emission and hard-to-abate sectors.

Most climate indicators are backward looking, since they reflect facts and are often released months later. The most coincident climate metric example is CO2 concentration data recorded daily at Mauna Loa in Hawaii, currently at 428ppm2. While these data points have been useful in the past to raise awareness about the status of climate activity, we expect investors to become more demanding about linking data points to a forward-looking signal on the speed of transition. From a macro perspective, trade flows warrant a closer look, since a country’s competitive advantage in low-carbon activity will be a growth driver. At a micro level, capex flows signal how fast low-carbon activity will play out.

In conclusion, a pragmatic approach means that we expect investors to adopt new ways of anticipating the speed of transition in 2026.

Would you like to find out more? Clients of HSBC Global Investment Research can click here* to read the full report.

To learn more about HSBC Global Investment Research, including how to subscribe, please email us at AskResearch@hsbc.com

HSBC Sustainability Sentiment Survey

What are investors thinking about sustainability now?

Find out more

For more information on gaining access to Global Research, ASK Research using the button below.